Why photography is the impression of light and shadow not? How does your monocular vision can become faithful to the human binocular vision? Why the photo has to be the product of a machine? Certainly the space where these issues collide is the sense of Perniola, or non-place of Augé; a place that generates spaces of interaction with guys that make up your identity there. Now, a question which seems to me to be at the top of the list of possible questions to images or text, is precisely that it has something to do with your truth (Foucault). What kind of vision is supposed to allow photography? That representation is impregnated such that if through her set a determined look on reality or, what kind of identity this subject aims to manufacture in the observer? The flow generated by the impact of questioning our own representations, results at work here. A series of images (imagini) real, without the machine, and binocular ...